<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Marketing&#8217;s Carbon Footprint: Does It Matter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://philbernstein.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/your-marketings-carbon-footprint-does-it-matter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://philbernstein.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/your-marketings-carbon-footprint-does-it-matter/</link>
	<description>Tell Your Story, Find More Customers and Make More Sales</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 08:58:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Beth Bengtson</title>
		<link>http://philbernstein.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/your-marketings-carbon-footprint-does-it-matter/#comment-791</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth Bengtson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 01:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philbernstein.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-791</guid>
		<description>Phil,

Thanks for your questions and I would love to reframe it slightly.
In our perspective, the opportunity here is not so much about the offset but about starting the dialogue with our clients around this topic.   We do need to start thinking about how we are impacting the environment and looking for ways to reduce that.  And to echo Chris&#039;s point if we can do that more efficiently why wouldn&#039;t we - it is just good business sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>Thanks for your questions and I would love to reframe it slightly.<br />
In our perspective, the opportunity here is not so much about the offset but about starting the dialogue with our clients around this topic.   We do need to start thinking about how we are impacting the environment and looking for ways to reduce that.  And to echo Chris&#8217;s point if we can do that more efficiently why wouldn&#8217;t we &#8211; it is just good business sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Carli</title>
		<link>http://philbernstein.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/your-marketings-carbon-footprint-does-it-matter/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Carli</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:56:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philbernstein.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-785</guid>
		<description>Chris:

Many thanks for providing a case in point!

Don Carli
dcarli@sustaincom.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris:</p>
<p>Many thanks for providing a case in point!</p>
<p>Don Carli<br />
<a href="mailto:dcarli@sustaincom.org">dcarli@sustaincom.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Sewell</title>
		<link>http://philbernstein.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/your-marketings-carbon-footprint-does-it-matter/#comment-784</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Sewell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 08:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://philbernstein.wordpress.com/?p=149#comment-784</guid>
		<description>The advertiser definitely has a responsibility for the carbon emissions that are created by their marketing communications. But firstly they need to understand them. We have developed a consistent methodology and calculator to help advertisers measure the amount of CO2 that is created in their marketing communications. Armed with this information the advertiser can then engage with their media buyers to discuss whether there is anything that can be done to reduce carbon while at the same time not adversely effect the strategic requirements of the media buy. As with all things in life if you are wasteful you will be emitting more CO2 than you have too. By measuring then reviewing the strategy advertisers will be able to do their bit to reduce emissions. The more targeted any advertiser is, the less impact they will have on the planet. This is not just good business sense it is good environmental practice. Sky writing is at the top of my list as well. Closely followed by any mobile (car or truck) billboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The advertiser definitely has a responsibility for the carbon emissions that are created by their marketing communications. But firstly they need to understand them. We have developed a consistent methodology and calculator to help advertisers measure the amount of CO2 that is created in their marketing communications. Armed with this information the advertiser can then engage with their media buyers to discuss whether there is anything that can be done to reduce carbon while at the same time not adversely effect the strategic requirements of the media buy. As with all things in life if you are wasteful you will be emitting more CO2 than you have too. By measuring then reviewing the strategy advertisers will be able to do their bit to reduce emissions. The more targeted any advertiser is, the less impact they will have on the planet. This is not just good business sense it is good environmental practice. Sky writing is at the top of my list as well. Closely followed by any mobile (car or truck) billboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
